“Our labelers disagree with each other.”
The model learns the confusion.
Your model can only be as good as its labels. We label your data carefully and consistently, and prove the quality with test sets and agreement scores. Start with a small pilot and see the numbers first.
“Our labelers disagree with each other.”
The model learns the confusion.
“The guidelines don’t cover real cases.”
Everyone guesses, differently.
“Quality drops as the dataset grows.”
Nobody measures it until the model fails.
We solve this by testing the guidelines, training people before they start, and measuring quality in every batch.
We test your guidelines on real data and send you a list of unclear cases.
Annotators practise and must pass before touching live data.
Hidden items with known answers measure accuracy every day.
Some items are labeled twice so we can measure agreement.
We group mistakes by cause and fix the guideline or training.
The pilot is where we catch problems. By the time we scale, the rules are clear and everyone is trained.
We only take on annotation types we have the people, tools and process for.
We work in your annotation platform or one you approve.
Clean, consistent examples for training and fine-tuning.
Labeled harmful content, from a team that knows moderation.
Relevance labels that improve results.
The right category and attributes for every item.
Intent and sentiment from real conversations.
Topic and type tags for large content libraries.
Definitions, edge cases and examples of correct and incorrect labels.
Annotation guide v1
Everyone labels the same set until agreement reaches the target.
Agreement report
Each batch is reviewed and scored before delivery.
Batch quality score
Disagreements become new rules, and the guide is versioned.
Guide changes and error analysis
Timings depend on volume and complexity. We agree them with you in writing before the pilot starts.
Labels you can trust and a clear list of confusing cases.
Runs the team, reports quality and handles questions.
Delivery dates tied to measured accuracy.
Send a sample of your real data and your guidelines. We label it, measure the quality and show you the results before you commit to more.
Still have a question? Ask us directly.
We work in your platform, or one you approve. That way your data stays where you control it.
With hidden gold test items, double labeling to measure agreement between annotators, and regular QA samples. You get the numbers in every report.
No. Those need specialist experts we do not claim to have. We focus on text, images, video, audio and product data.
Big enough to test the guidelines on real variety. We suggest a size once we see your data.
It depends on how clear the task is. We do not quote a number before we have seen your data. The pilot gives you a measured figure, and you decide if it is enough.
Tell us what you need to run, fix, or growWe will map out the right team and a pilot plan
We use necessary cookies to keep this site secure and working. Optional analytics and marketing cookies stay off unless you accept them. Read our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.